Friday, May 06, 2005

Art Chicago in the Park

I spent last week working on the newly tented Art Chicago in the Park for Thomas Blackman and Associates (TBA). It was chaotic, but it happened and I think the organizers were proud of themselves. The show seemed to have a good word of mouth and response in the press and the competing Chicago Contemporary and Classic show, which took over TBA's old Navy Pier spot, apparently was as lame as the name suggests. We shall see how it all plays out yet over the next coming months. I suppose one of the newspapers will declare victory for someone at somepoint in the Chicago Art Fair Wars of 2005.

There are a couple things that TBA has going for them that I never see mentioned in the discussions about the show.

The first is that first Thomas Blackman is an optimist and has some vision and seems to have done this sort of thing long enough to trust if you keep putting an idea out and talking about it in the way you want it to be understood then the audience will eventually go along with it...assuming he can stay financially afloat in the mean time. This is brand management I suppose but also what having vision is, whether you agree with the vision or not. I sense vision in Michael Workman and the Nova Young Art Fair but not in CC&C.

The second thing is that TBA is really very unrooted/live-out-of-boxes seeming organization, and the kind of somewhat-underprepared and disorganized feel of it all gives them a lot of experience troubleshooting and managing crisis. I think this will help them transition without falling too far behind. If they had taken a year off to regroup and create a perfect comeback show they would have lost momentum and put a lot more pressure on their backs to be perfect, which I doubt they ever are, so this way they blaze ahead and are able to take the transition in stride. I suppose the downside to this is keeping staff happy/healthy, and keeping the finances straight with this kind of scene is harder.

So after working the fair I think Art Chicago has a good shot of surviving. The city government seems supportive of their idea, the location (weather permitting) is way better, and they are forced to try something new.

Now was the fair some so radical, new and breathtaking experiment? No. It seemed more intimate to me though as a smaller show. As a viewer I liked that. Maybe the art collectors have other opinions.

e

Wednesday, May 04, 2005

MIT Performance Opportunity (Time Travel)

The Time Traveler Convention

May 7, 2005, 10:00pm EDT (08 May 2005 02:00:00 UTC)
(events start at 8:00pm)

East Campus Courtyard, MIT
3 Ames St. Cambridge, MA 02142

42:21:36.025°N, 71:05:16.332°W

(42.360007,-071.087870 in decimal degrees)

http://web.mit.edu/adorai/timetraveler/

e

Tuesday, May 03, 2005

Performance @ the Butcher Shop “Spring Break” Opening

I took a trip down to the Butcher Shop, which is used as artist studio space but also hosts the odd art event, for the “Spring Break” show. The work was a wildly uneven collection of mostly visual work by the studio dwellers, ex-SAIC folks and friends. With Pabst Blue Ribbon as a sponsor and the bikini-drinking-druggin-sun-shinin iconography on the walls the scene was set for spring break craziness.

I missed the violent end but was there for the anxious build-up and the party starting to swell. I missed the fashion show, the art getting trashed, the room getting tagged and so on but really I went in all honesty, on an unfortunately cold Chicago spring day, because they advertised a performance.

It ended up being a woman getting a tattoo of a “Reggae Butterfly” on her ankle.

Pedestaled on a crowded stage of tattoo gear, two chairs, tattoo artist and girl we gathered to witness a woman in a short skirt and “Hawaii” t-shirt mildly grimacing in pain as she got her first tattoo. She wasn’t drunk or anything, neither of them really engaged the audience that gathered then dispersed, mostly it seems staged for several photographers. I asked her some questions about her motivations and she wanted to “mark the occasion” and made a vague comment on her interest in how people find identity through what they war and buy which the tattoo is both. She was getting it for free (but giving a tip) and no one else was offered the chance to get a tat.

It was a rather closed action that carried little meaning or impact for me…and I looked and asked questions and hoped it would become something. It seemed rather lame in the end, kind of a small step for her and a giant leap in place for the rest of us.

Why a reggae colored butterfly someone asked me? I hadn’t even thought to ask, it seemed like the kind of dumb spring break tattoo you convince yourself to get while in Florida or somewhere. My friend wasn’t so sure. I suppose this was an ambiguity I didn’t want squelched with a mediocre reply. I suppose if there was any risk involved here it was the commitment to live with a silly tattoo.

e

Sunday, May 01, 2005

What performance, where...?

I haven't seen much lately.

I admit I have missed a couple things, here is what and then my excuse.

I missed Joseph Ravens opening night performance with a inflated ball on opening of NOVA cause I was working Art Chicago in the Park and was falling asleep standing up. For real. It was embarrassing. I hear Joseph has been doing this piece and variations of it for years. I wonder why he keeps doing it.

I missed whatever opening night performances happened at the SAIC MFA thesis show. Actually I got there 15 minutes before they kicked us all out. My bad. I saw Magdalen's piano piece briefly and I heard that Justin Cooper had something on his foot. I am sure it was funny Justin is a funny guy. Unfortunately they wouldn't let me bad upstairs to see it. The performance kids this generation seemed to mostly do installation rooms.

Connor Kalista's audio tour, Terminal Marine, is still going at Links Hall but I have missed it so far...I have a cold. I think they extended the dates so there is still plenty of time.

erik